Three ways in

A progression programme that answers: what do I do next?

Start with the route that fits you. The intended progression is identity → route → next action → evidence → review → public record, with placement only by opt-in where eligible.

Build
Enter as a builder and start with the free pass.
Who it's for
Builders ready to work on a challenge.
Free pass route
The route can issue a pass when the database is configured. A pass is not a signed-in Builder profile.
Get a free pass
Bring a challenge
Bring a real problem for builders to work on.
Who it's for
Institutions, partners, and others with a challenge to share.
Email contact
There is no structured challenge intake form yet.
Email a challenge
Open a node
Propose a city or campus node: one convenor, one room, five builders.
Who it's for
Convenors ready to organize a node.
Claim form
A claim is reviewed manually; submitting it does not create or confirm a node.
Propose a node

What happens after entry

Identity → route → next action → evidence → review → public record. Marketplace placement is a separate opt-in and only applies where eligible.

This is the progression model, not an end-to-end automated flow yet. The free pass issues a ticket, not a signed-in Builder profile. Challenge contact is by email; there is no challenge intake form. Node claims are submitted for manual review and do not automatically create or confirm nodes. The Wall currently renders its checked-in records; evidence submission and review are not wired into it. The Marketplace page is a memorandum, not an opt-in placement workflow.